SUHAS C.SEN, S.P.BHARUCHA, J.S.VERMA
VINEET NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER
1. The learned Solicitor General reports that necessary action, as required by the previous order dated 22-2-1996 with regard to the documents seized in 1991, has been taken. The office report dated 29-2-1996 is perused. It is directed that the documents in question be kept under the seal of this Court by the Registrar (Judicial) in a vault in the State Bank of India, Parliament Street, New Delhi, to be arranged by the CBI. The key thereof would be retained securely by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. This arrangement with the Bank would be in the joint name of the Registrar General and the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to be operated by anyone of them under the directions of this Court.
2. It is appropriate that the procedure indicated for the safe custody of the documents seized in 1991 in our earlier order dated 22-2-1996 is adopted also in respect of all documents seized in 1995 or thereafter, having any evidentiary value. We, therefore, give the same direction in respect of the remaining documents for their safe custody.
3. The learned Solicitor General states that in all only three floppies were seized and that seizure was made in January 1996 by the FERA au
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.