SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 514

SUHAS C.SEN, S.P.BHARUCHA, J.S.VERMA
VINEET NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. The learned Solicitor General reports that necessary action, as required by the previous order dated 22-2-1996 with regard to the documents seized in 1991, has been taken. The office report dated 29-2-1996 is perused. It is directed that the documents in question be kept under the seal of this Court by the Registrar (Judicial) in a vault in the State Bank of India, Parliament Street, New Delhi, to be arranged by the CBI. The key thereof would be retained securely by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. This arrangement with the Bank would be in the joint name of the Registrar General and the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to be operated by anyone of them under the directions of this Court.

2. It is appropriate that the procedure indicated for the safe custody of the documents seized in 1991 in our earlier order dated 22-2-1996 is adopted also in respect of all documents seized in 1995 or thereafter, having any evidentiary value. We, therefore, give the same direction in respect of the remaining documents for their safe custody.

3. The learned Solicitor General states that in all only three floppies were seized and that seizure was made in January 1996 by the FERA au







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top