SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 506

Supreme Court Of India
Decided On : (September 23, 1991)
FELDOHFAUTO AND GAS INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Versus
Union of India

The appellants were allowed to pursue the writ petition on the point of validity in the notification, while being directed to address other assessment details in regular appeals under the Act.

Headnote:

ALTERNATIVE REMEDY - WRIT PETITION - The court allowed the appeal and restored the writ petition to be disposed of by the High court in regard to the point of validity in the notification, while directing the appellants to agitate other points concerning details of the assessment in regular appeals under the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The High court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants on the ground of not availing the alternative remedy of appeal. The appellants had challenged the validity of a notification in the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the appeal and restored the writ petition to be disposed of by the High court in regard to the point of validity in the notification, while directing the appellants to agitate other points concerning details of the assessment in regular appeals under the Act.

Issues: Dismissal of writ petition for not availing alternative remedy of appeal, validity of notification, and the scope of contentions in the appeal under statutory provisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellants were allowed to pursue the writ petition on the point of validity in the notification, while being directed to address other assessment details in regular appeals under the Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, restored the writ petition, and directed the appellants to address specific points in regular appeals under the Act.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) WE have heard counsel for both the parties. The High court has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants on the short ground that the petitioners have not availed themselves of the alternative remedy of appeal. It is pointed out on behalf of the appellants that they had challenged the validity of Notification No. 174/89 dated 1/9/1989 in the writ petition and this is a contention which will not be open to them in the appeal under the statutory provisions. There is force in this contention. We, therefore, allow the appeal and restore the writ petition to be disposed of by the High court in regard to the point of validity in the notification. The other points concerning details of the assessment, if any, should, however, be agitated by the appellants in the regular appeals under the Act, if any.

( 3 ) THE Civil is disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top