SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 27

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
I. A. QURESHI – Respondent


( 1 ) SPECIAL leave granted.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24/2/1993, passed by the M. P. State Administrative tribunal, Jabalpur bench, in OA No. 2402 of 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "the tribunal" ).

( 3 ) THE respondent is employed as Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department of the government of Madhya Pradesh. Departmental proceedings were initiated against him on charges of misconduct. During the pendency of those proceedings. Departmental Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as "the DPC") considered the case of the respondent for promotion to the higher post of Superintending Engineer. In view of the pendency of departmental proceedings against the respondent, the recommendations of the DPC as regards the respondent were placed in a sealed cover. In the departmental proceedings, minor penalty of censure was imposed on the respondent. Thereafter, the respondent filed an application (OA No. 2402 of 1992 before the tribunal wherein he sought the relief that the sealed cover containing the recommendations of the DPC should be opened and the recommendations of the DPC be given effect to. The said application of the respondent has bee







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top