SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 788

S.N.VARIAVA, S.S.M.QUADRI
LEENA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
RABI SHANKAR MUKHERJEE – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioner is the wife of the respondent. The respondent has filed a matrimonial suit being HMA No. 748 of 2000, titled Rabi Shankar mukherjee v. Leena Mukherjee in the Court of the learned Additional District judge, Delhi. The petitioner is a resident of Durgapur, District Burdwan, west Bengal. She states that she is a distressed woman without any financial resources and that with the meagre income which she gets by way of maintenance, it is not possible for her to travel from Durgapur to Delhi to prosecute the case. She also submits that there is nobody to accompany her to delhi. The above fact is not traversed in the counter-affidavit. Having regard to the cirsumstances, we think that it would be appropriate to order transfer of the matrimonial suit from the Court of the Additional District Judge, delhi.

( 2 ) ACCORDINGLY, HMA No. 748 of 2000 pending in the Court of the additional District Judge, Delhi shall stand transferred to the District Judge, burdwan, West Bengal, who may try the case himself or assign it to any other court having jurisdiction to try the case.

( 3 ) THE transfer petition is accordingly, allowed.

( 4 ) NO costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top