( 1 ) WE have gone through the application for review and the connected papers. The application is supported by an affidavit by the petitioner Jagmohan, former Lieutenant-Governor of Delhi who was respondent 2 in Writ petitions 535-539 of 1980, decided on 7/10/1985. He seeks review of the judgment delivered by this court principally on the ground that there is an error apparent on the face of the record as the judgment turns on certain arguments and statements attributed to Shri L. N. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for respondent 1, the Union of India and to Shri M. C. Bhandare, learned counsel appearing for respondent 3, Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The petitioner Jagmohan avers in the affidavit that the contents of paras 1 to 3 are true to his knowledge and based on information derived from the counsel appearing in the case which he believes to be true. Along with the application for review he has annexed a letter dated 12/10/1985 addressed by Shri p. P. Singh who was assisting Shri L. N. Sinha asserting that the learned counsel had never advanced the arguments attributed to him in the judgment and a letter of Shri M. C. Bhandare dated 13/10/1985 addressed to Shri B. P. Mahe