SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 917

DALVEER BHANDARI, S.B.SINHA
Commissioner Of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Indian Aluminium Co. LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. - Whether zinc dross and flux skimming are excisable articles is the question involved in this appeal, which arises out of a judgment and order dated 25.06.2004 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, allowing the appeal filed by Respondent herein.

2. Respondent herein manufactures aluminium sheets, the raw material wherefor is aluminium oxide. In the melting furnance, the top layer of the molten metal is exposed to atmosphere and gets oxidized. As a result of oxidation, a thin layer/film is formed which is removed by skimming. The second layer so removed is called dross. Indisputably, the percentage of metal in dross will vary and there would be some quantity of aluminium metal therein.

3. Whether excise duty is payable on ‘dross’ came up for consideration before a Bench of this Court in Respondent’s own case i.e. in Union of India and Others v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. and Another, [1995 Supp (2) SCC 465 : 1995 (77) ELT 268]. The said decision has been followed by a 3-Judge Bench of this Court in Collector of Central Excise, Patna v. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. [(2004) 9 SCC 1].

4. The Tribunal by reason of its impugned judgm




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top