SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 333

2006(8) Supreme 660
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.K. Sema & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ.
Kanaksinh Mohansinh Mangrola - Appellant
versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 393 of 2006
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2937 of 2005)
Decided on 7-4-2006

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Application for bail - Applicant was on interim bail for 15 days from 13-4-2005 - He filed bail application on 19-4-2005 - He was to be considered in custody on the date bail application was moved - High Court should have considered bail application on merits and should not have dismissed it as not maintainable holding that accused was not in custody - Impugned order dismissing bail application as not maintainable was liable to be set aside.(Paras 4 and 5)

       

ORDER

1. Heard the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal is directed against the order of the High Court passed on 11-5-2005 rejecting the bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 CrPC mainly on the question of non-maintainability of the application. According to the High Court the petition under Section 439 CrPC is not maintainable as the petitioner was not in custody.

4. From the bail application filed on 19-4-2005 by the appellant under Section 439 CrPC, it clearly appears that on that day the appellant was in custody as he was on interim bail for 15 days from 13-4-2005 and his application could have been considered on merits instead of dismissing the same on the ground of non-maintainability.

5. In the view that we have taken, the impugned order of the High Court is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the High Court to consider the matter afresh on merits. The application filed by the appellant under Section 439 CrPC is now restored before the High Court and shall be disposed of on merits. The appellant is directed to appear before the High Court on 21-4-2006. The appellant is granted bail till 21-4-2006.

6. With the aforesaid direction this appeal is allowed.

Appeal allowed.

**************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top