SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 333

H.K.SEMA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Kanaksinh Mohansinh Mangrola – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal is directed against the order of the High Court passed on 11-5-2005 rejecting the bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 CrPC mainly on the question of non-maintainability of the application. According to the High Court the petition under Section 439 CrPC is not maintainable as the petitioner was not in custody.

4. From the bail application filed on 19-4-2005 by the appellant under Section 439 CrPC, it clearly appears that on that day the appellant was in custody as he was on interim bail for 15 days from 13-4-2005 and his application could have been considered on merits instead of dismissing the same on the ground of non-maintainability.

5. In the view that we have taken, the impugned order of the High Court is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the High Court to consider the matter afresh on merits. The application filed by the appellant under Section 439 CrPC is now restored before the High Court and shall be disposed of on merits. The appellant is directed to appear before the High Court on 21-4-2006. The appellant is granted bail till 21-4-2006.

6. With the aforesaid direction this appea


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top