A.R.LAKSHMANAN, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Muni Suvrat-Swami Jain S. M. P. Sangh – Appellant
Versus
Arun Nathuram Gaikwad – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J. - Leave granted.
2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 23.02.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 2841 of 2005 whereby the High Court while allowing the writ petition directed the Municipal Corporation to demolish the entire illegal and unauthorized construction carried on by respondent Nos. 3-17 on entire CTS No. 206, 206(1 to 9), Kurla Part-IV, New Mill Road, Kurla (W), Mumbai.
3. The short facts leading to the filing of the above appeal as stated in the S.L.P. are as under:-
Shri Fernandes and others (hereinafter referred to as Original owners) owned a plot of land bearing C.T.S. No.206 and 206/1 to 9 and CTS No.212 and 212/1 to 4, N.A. Survey No.764 & 768, of Village/Taluka, Kurla, Mumbai, Suburban District, consisting of two bungalows and one chawl of 8 tenements. It is to be noted that there is only one entrance to the property from A.H. Wadia Marg (New Mill Road) through a strip of land about 12 feet wide (hereinafter referred to as access road). The tenants/occupants used the said access road to access their respective premises, including the writ petitioner before the High
Abdul Rehman Siddique and Others v. Ahmed Mia Gulam Mohuddin Ahmedji and another
G.J.Kanga, Adm. Of Municipal Corpn., Greater Bombay and Another v. S.S. Basha
Corporation of Calcutta v. Mulchand Aggarwal
Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat
State (Delhi Admn.) v. I.K.Nangia and Another
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Another v. Mohd. Ismail and Others
Syed Muzaffar Ali and Others v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.