B.P.SINGH, ALTAMAS KABIR
Purushottam – Appellant
Versus
Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.P. Singh, J. - In this appeal by special leave the plaintiffs are the appellants. Their suit against original defendant nos. 1 to 9 was decreed for the sum of Rs.8,92,815.14 by the Third Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nagpur in Civil Suit No.52 of 1980. On appeal by original defendants 1 to 3, the High Court in First Appeal No.35 of 1988 by its impugned judgment and order of April 10, 1992 allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit holding that in view of the provisions of Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the suit was not maintainable, the plaintiff being an unregistered firm.
2. The facts of the case are not in dispute and they will be briefly noticed. Plaintiff No.1, Purushottam, carried on business as whole-sale paper merchant in the name and style of "Dinesh Paper Mart" as the sole proprietor of the concern. During this period he supplied goods to the defendant firm namely – Shivraj Fine Arts Litho Works, a firm registered under the Partnership Act. Defendants 2 to 9 were the partners of the said firm. In the year 1974, Special Civil Suit No.9 of 1974 was filed for dissolution of the defendant partnership firm
Addanki Narayanappa and Anr. Vs. Bhaskara Krishnappa (D) and Ors.
Raptakos Brett and Co.Ltd. Vs. Ganesh Property
REFERRED TO : Haldiram Bhujiawala and Anr. Vs. Anand Kumar Deepak Kumar and Anr.
U.P.State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Jain Construction Co.And Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.