S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Siemens LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. - Leave granted.
2. Whether the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would interfere with a demand directing payment of cess is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 8.07.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 4338 of 2005.
3. The appellant is a multi location company. It has a factory and godown at Kalwe. It pays cess for the goods supplied from the said factory in terms of the provisions of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. It also owns a factory at Aurangabad. Its office is at Kharghar. The said factory at Aurangabad and the office at Kharghar are outside the jurisdiction of the city limits of Navi Mumbai and, thus, outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Bombay Municipal Corporation. Supplies are made to dealers directly from the appellants factory situated at Aurangabad and office at Kharghar. However, the establishment of the appellant at Kalwe was directed to pay taxes, although according to it, no jurisdictional fact exists therefor.
4. The demand was made terming the same as a sh
Union of India and Another v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana
Rajesh Kumar and Ors. v. D.C.I.T. and Ors.
Shri Shekhar Ghosh v. Union of India and Anr.
Special Director and Another v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse and Another
Referred to : State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahm Datt Sharma and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.