ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Shah Mansukhlal Chhaganlal (d) through Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Gohil Amarsing Govindbhai (d) through Lrs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. - Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court. Second appeal filed by the respondents in terms of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the Code) was allowed. Though various questions were raised in support of the appeal, it was primarily highlighted that the Second Appeal was allowed without formulating any substantial question of law.
3. There is no appearance on behalf of respondents when the matter is called though learned counsel had entered appearance.
4. Section 100 of the Code deals with "Second Appeal". The provision reads as follows:
"100 (1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or by any other law for the time being in force, an appeal shall lie to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any court subordinate to the High Court, if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law.
(2) An appeal may lie under this section from an appellate decree passed ex-parte.
(3) In an appeal under this section, the memorandum of appeal shall precisely state the substantial question of law
C.A. Sulaiman and Ors. v. State Bank of Travancore, Alwayee and Ors.
Jawala Singh (D) by Lrs. v. Jagat Singh (D) by Lrs.
REFERRED TO : Ishwar Dass Jain v. Sohan Lal
Chadat Singh v. Bahadur Ram and Ors.
Thakur Kishan Singh v. Arvind Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.