SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1123

H.K.SEMA, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
S. K. Saigal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.K. Sema, J. - The challenge in these appeals is to the orders dated 22.8.2003 and 27.2.2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court affirming the order dated 30.10.2002 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) allowing the petition of the respondents.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

The respondents were working as Junior Hydro-Geologist, Junior Geophysicist Chemists and Hydro-Meteorologists (Scientists Grade B). Their cases for consideration for promotion to the posts of Scientists Grade C were declined on the ground that the departmental candidate should have put in at least 5 years as Scientists Grade B in the scale of Rs. 2200-4000 in accordance with Rule 7 (2)(b) read with column 12 of Central Ground Water Board (Scientific Group A Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1995 (hereinafter the Rules). We will deal with the Rules later at an appropriate time.

3. The grievance raised before the Tribunal was that the deputationists with 8 years of experience in the scale of Rs. 2000-3500 were allowed to be promoted as Scientists Grade C in the scale of Rs. 3000-4500 whereas in the case of the departmental candidates working in the scale of Rs. 2200-4000






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top