LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, C.K.THAKKER, ARIJIT PASAYAT
NOIDA Entrepreneurs Assn. – Appellant
Versus
NOIDA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.—The present order will dispose of one of the issues relating to decision of the Uttar Pradesh Government not to take disciplinary action against Smt. Neera Yadav-respondent No.7.
2. A brief reference to certain earlier events and orders passed by this Court would be necessary.
On consideration of complaints received during the period 1994-96 the State Government decided to enquire into the allegations. These allegations related to irregularities in allotments and conversions of land in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (in short ‘NOIDA’). Explanation was asked by Principal Secretary (Heavy Industries) of the Government of U.P. from Smt. Neera Yadav. On 2.2.1995 the then Chief Minister of U.P. observed that there was no need for any action in the matter. In November, 1995, a Memorandum was submitted by NOIDA Entrepreneurs Association- the petitioner in the present writ petition, requesting for enquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation (in short the ‘CBI’) regarding the alleged irregularities in allotments and conversions in NOIDA. It appears at different stages Smt. Neera Yadav submitted her explanations. On 13.12.1996 a letter was wri
State of Rajasthan v. B.K. Meena & Ors.
Union of India and Anr. v. Bihari Lal Sidhana
Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd.
Teri Oat Estates (P.) Ltd. v. U.T. Chandigarh and Ors.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and Others v. T. Srinivas
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Others v. Sarvesh Berry
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Depot Manager, A.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Mohd. Yousuf Miya and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.