JUDGMENT

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court allowing prayer made by respondent No.1 for certain directions and directing to have a fresh meeting of Sri Lohana Mahaparishad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Mahaparishad’).

3. A brief reference as projected by the appellant to the factual aspects would suffice.

4. A suit was filed relating to the function of Mahaparishad. On the basis of the consent order i.e. in an appeal from the order No.427/2005 the High Court directed to have a General Body Meeting containing 23 Agendas including the agenda for holding the election of President of the Mahaparishad and four trustees. The suit was accordingly disposed of. A Court Commissioner was appointed and the agenda notice containing the details of 23 agenda items were circulated to more than 650 members and the meeting was fixed at Ahmedabad on 3.7.2005. The meeting of the Madhyastha Maha Samiti (in short ‘Maha Samiti’) of Mahaparishad was held. On the request of majority of members, item no.9 pertaining to the election of four trustees in place of the retiring trustees and agenda no