SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 408

B.P.SINGH, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Makhan Singh (D) By LRs – Appellant
Versus
Kulwant Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.—These appeals by special leave arise out of the following facts:

2. The plaintiff-respondent Kulwant Singh and defendant-appellant Makhan Singh (now through his LRs.) herein were two of four brothers. As per the case set up, each brother owned 1/4 share in land measuring 40.2/3 marlas and in a building housing an ice factory situated at Rayya alongwith 1/8 share in the machinery installed therein. On 3.5.1982, the defendant entered into two agreements with the plaintiff, – one for the sale of his share in the land measuring 40.2/3 marlas and the building on it for a consideration of Rs.10,000/- with earnest money of Rs.5,000/-, and a second pertaining to the sale of his share in the machinery installed in the ice factory for a consideration of Rs. 16,000/- out of which Rs. 5,000/- was paid as earnest money. These agreements are Ex.P-1 and Ex.P-2 on the record. As per the terms of the agreements, the sale deeds were to be executed on or before 10.8.1982. It was pleaded that the defendant defaulted on which a notice was served on him on 19.12.1983 but as no result was forthcoming, a suit for specific performance was filed on 17.1.1984.

3. The defendant c





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top