MARKANDEY KATJU, S.B.SINHA
Ashok Kumar Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Khanna – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.
INTRODUCTION :
2. Interpretation of Section 34 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (for short, ‘the Act’) is involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 06.02.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in APOT No. 584 of 2005, affirming a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the said Court.
BACKGROUND FACTS :
3. M/s Dunlop India Ltd. (for short, ‘the Company’) is an existing company within the meaning of Section 3(1)(ii) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Company floated a Fund known as ‘Dunlop Executive Staff Pension Fund’ for providing pension and annuities to the members of the executive management staff of the Company. Clause (3) of the said deed reads as under :
“These presents shall constitute a trust upon and subject to the Rules and to the law for the time being in force in India relating to Pension Funds which trust irrevocable and no moneys belonging to the Fund in hand of the trustees shall be recoverable by the Company or shall the Company have any lien or charge of any description on the same.”
4. Part I of the said deed provides for the ‘Rules of Dunlop Executive Staff Pension Fund.
“Memb
Smt. Nilima Ghosh and Another v. Prakriti Bhusan Mitter
Sahebzadi Amina Marzia v. Syed Mohd. Hussain and Others
Hasan Bin Mubarak v. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and Others
Manjunath Anandappa Urf Shivappa Hanasi v. Tammanasa and Others
Official Trustee, West Bengal and Others v. Sachindra Nath Chatterjee and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.