S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Labour Commr. & Ors – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
S.B. SINHA, J : —
Leave granted.
2. Relationship between the parties hereto is employer and workmen. As far back in the year 1983, the appellant terminated the services of 37 workmen allegedly on the ground that they had gone on an illegal strike. It gave rise to an industrial dispute. The management and its 19 workmen entered into compromise. One workman died during pendency of the said dispute. Claim of 17 workmen, therefore, survived for ajudication in the aforementioned industrial dispute. By an award dated 26.05.1993, the industrial court, to which reference of the dispute was made by the appropriate government, directed :
“–Accordingly, the Employers are directed to reinstate these 17 workers on duty on the original post and payscale within one month after the date of publication of this Award. So far as the question of back-wages is concerned, these workmen are to be paid 50% of their wages/ allowances which they were getting on 2-6-83, for the period 1-8-87 till the date of their joining the duty, within 2 months of publication of this Award. As regards the deceased Komal Singh, his Provident Fund, Insurance money and wages/ allowances upto 30-9-91 to be calcul
Kohinoor Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd., Adyal v. Presiding Officer, Second Labour Court
Bala Subrahmanya Rajaram v. B.C. Patil and Others [(1958) SCR 1504] (Para 30)
Sanghi Jeevaraj Ghewar Chand & Ors. v. Secretary, Madras Chillies
Muir Mills Co. Ltd. v. Suti Mills Mazdoor Union
Gajraj Singh and Others v. State of U.P. and Others [(2001) 5 SCC 762] (Para 25)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.