S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Bajrang Factory LTD. – Appellant
Versus
University of Calcutta. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J. —
1.Construction/ interpretation of a Will executed by one Nerode Chandra Vasu Mullick on 04.03.1932 vis-à-vis certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act (for short “the Act”), viz., Sections 113, 116 and 129 falls for our consideration in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and decree passed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court affirming a judgment and order dated 2.06.1992 passed by a learned Single Judge of the said Court in Suit No. 866 of 1979 on a preliminary issue raised by the appellants therein as to whether the respondents had any locus to file the suit in question.
2.Before embarking on the said questions, we may notice the admitted fact of the matter.
3.Appellant No. 1 is an existing company within the meaning of the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It claims its title in respect of the disputed premises by a lease executed by the Chamong Tea Company Limited as also purchase of a property by a deed of sale.
4.The property in question admittedly belonged to Late Nerode Chandra Vasu Mullick. The legatee under the Will Shri Hamir Chandra Vasu Mullick through whom Appellant No.1 claims its right, title and interest was his son
Margaret Goonewardens v. Eva Moonemale Goonewardene and others
Arunkumar and Another v. Shriniwas and Others
Uma Devi Nambiar and Others v. T.C. Sidhan (Dead) (2004) 2 SCC 321 – Referred to. (Para 41)
Navneet Lal Alias Rangi v. Gokul and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.