MARKANDEY KATJU, S.B.SINHA
Hatti Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J.—
1.Deceased was owner of two Maruti vans. The same were used to be plied on hire. On or about 11.07.1995, he brought the vehicle bearing Registration No. DDA 3665 at the taxi stand of Hansi. It was hired by someone. He did not return thereafter. A search was made but he could not be traced. On or about 22.07.1995, Rajbir (PW-9) received an information that one Maruti van had been seen abandoned and recovered by the police. He went to the Police Station, Narnaud. It was identified to be the same vehicle which was owned by the deceased. Stains of blood were also noticed inside the Maruti van. A First Information Report was lodged by him on the same day, whereupon a case under Section 364 IPC was instituted. On the next day i.e. on 24.07.1995, a dead body was recovered from a canal. The dead body was in such a condition that it did not bear any mark of identification. An inquest was conducted. The dead body was identified by Jai Singh (PW-13) and Satbir Singh on the basis of identification of the clothes found on the person of the deceased, which were said to have been stitched by the said Satbir Singh. He had, however, not been examined. A statement was made by
[See also State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran and Anr. JT 2007 (5) SC 146].(Para 28)
[See Geejaganda Somaiah v. State of Karnataka AIR 2007 SCW 1681].(Para 1681)
State of U.P. v. Satish [2005 (3) SCC 114].(Para 28)
State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram [2006 (11) SCALE 440]. (Para 8)
[See also Raj Kumar Prasad Tamarkar v. State of Bihar & Another 2007 (1) SCALE 19].(Para 26)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.