ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Commissioner of Central Excise Indore – Appellant
Versus
Cethar Vessels LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. —
1.All these appeals involve identical questions and are, therefore, taken up together for consideration.
2.In all these appeals challenge is to the final order passed by the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short the ‘CEGAT’). The basic question is whether the erection of Boiler at site by assembling various components and parts has brought into existence immovable property or not that is the issue involved in Civil Appeal Nos. 5391-5393 of 2002, 4100 of 2003 and 3447 of 2006. In Civil Appeal Nos.6533-34 of 2002 the erection related to Membrane Cell Technology and Civil Appeal No.4156 relates to solvent extraction Plant. Stand of the appellant is that the fabrication of such plants out of duty paid bought out items amounts to manufacture of a new marketable commodity and therefore excise duty is payable.
3.The CEGAT held that no excise duty is leviable and thus these plants are not subject to excisability. It accepted stand of the respondents that these plants are basically systems comprising of various components and are thus in the nature of systems and are not machines as a whole. Accordingly, such systems as a w
Quality Steel Tubes Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE [(1995 (75) E.L.T. 17 (SC].(Para 5)
Mittal Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v CCE
Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. CCE
Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. v. CCE (2000 (120) E.L.T. 273 (SC)]. (Para 5)
CCE Jaipur v. Man Structurals Ltd. [(2001 (130) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.)]. (Para 5)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.