SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 28

R.C.LAHOTI, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
PUNJ LLOYD LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PETRONET MHB LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The agreement entered into between the parties contains an arbitration clause which reads as under:

"14.1. Disputes or differences arising out of or in relation to agreement/contract shall be referred to the Functional Director of the owner who may either act himself as sole arbitrator or nominate some officer of the owner to act as an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties (except those in respect of which the decision of any person is by the contract expressed to be final and binding).

14.2. The contractor shall not be entitled to raise any objection to the appointment of such officer of the owner as the sole arbitrator on the ground that the said officer is an officer of the owner or that he/she has to deal or dealt with the matter to which the contract relates or that in the course of duties as an officer of the owner he/she has/had expressed views on all or any of the matters in dispute or difference.

14.3. In the event of the arbitrator to whom the matter is originally referred to is transferred or vacates office, the Functional Director, aforesaid, shall nominate another officer of the owner to act as arbitrator.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top