SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 581

K.RAMASWAMY, R.M.SAHAI
D. C. AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Though the petitioner is seeking in IA four reliefs, we do not consider it expedient to make any order in that behalf. IA No. 3 of 1994 is taken on board. In this application the respondents have sought for clarification or modification of the order dated 11 - 3 - 19941 and for extention of time for compliance with the order dated 11 - 3 - 19941• It is stated in the petition that the Chairman and the Managing Director is the Appellate Authority and as a consequence he cannot deal with the matter sitting as a member of the Committee to consider the case of the appellant. It is further stated that as regards Mr N.G. Pillai and Mr R. Sinha, Deputy Managing Director (Personnel) and Deputy Managing Director (Corporate Operations and Services) respectively, they having dealt with the matter, the appellant has some reservation about them. Under those circumstances, they are unable to be nominated as members of the Committee as directed earlier by this Court.

2. We appreciate the stand taken by the Bank. Since this Court has directed that the Managing Director of the Bank would be the member of the Committee, instead of Dr. M.K. Sinha of the Bank, we direct the respondent State Ba


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top