SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1347

S.H.KAPADIA, RUMA PAL, S.B.SINHA
M. C. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


ORDER

1. By the order dated 19 - 7 - 20041 this Court had inter alia directed -

(I) CBI to prepare and supply self - contained notes in respect of the findings against the officers of the V.P. State Government as also of the Central Government to the respective governments within a period of one week from date.

We are told by the learned Solicitor General appearing on behalf of CBI a that this has been complied with.

(2) The U.P. State Government and the Central Government have been directed to take further action on such copies and complete the disciplinary proceedings within a period of three weeks from the date of the order.

2. Mr Ashok Desai, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of U.P. has stated that with regard to Shri Bagga, on the basis of the earlier note submitted by CBI (referred to as CBI I), the departmental enquiry is complete and the recommendations for punishment to be inflicted on the charged officer had been forwarded to VPSC where it is pending consideration. It is also stated that departmental enquiry on the basis of the second note submitted by CBI (CBI II) has been initiated. As far as Shri Punia is concerned, the departmental enquiry on the ba





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top