SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1124

ASHOK BHAN, DALVEER BHANDARI
P. R. METRANI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE – Respondent


Judgment

ASHOK BHAN, J. - These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 9 - 7 - 2001 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in ITRCs Nos. 38, 39 and 40 of 1996 vide which the High Court has allowed

Reference Cases Nos. 39 and 40 of 1996 thereby answering the questions in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. ITRC No. 38 of 1996 filed by the assessee has been dismissed by the High Court. Since these appeals arise from the common order passed by the High Court, we also propose to dispose of them by a common order.

Facts

2. The facts relevant for disposing of these references in short are:

P.R. Metrani and YR Metrani were two brothers and are the members of the joint Hindu family. PR. Metrani (HUF), the assessee was a partner in a firm called M/s RN. Metrani and Sons. Y.R. Metrani was also a partner in this firm. PR. Metrani as well as Y.R Metrani have died during the pendency of these cases.

3. A search of the residential premises Ranganatha Nilaya was conducted by the Income Tax, Central Excise and Customs Departments on 30 - 6 - 1982 and 1 - 7 - 1982 and as well as the business premises where the business of the firm was being conducted. The

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top