SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1623

B.N.KIRPAL, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


ORDER

1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we issue, as an interim measure, the following directions:

1. Targeted Public Distribution Scheme (TPDS)

(i) It is the case of the Union of India that there has been full compliance with regard to the allotment of food - grain in relation to TPDS. However, if any of the States gives a specific instance of noncompliance, the Union of India will do the needful within the framework of the Scheme.

(ii) The States are directed to complete the identification of BPL families, issuing of cards and commencement of distribution of 25 kg grain per family per month latest by 1 - 1 - 2002.

(iii) The Delhi Government will ensure that TPDS application forms are freely available and are given and received free of charge and there is an effective mechanism in place to ensure speedy and effective redressal of grievances.

2. Antyodaya Anna Yojana

(i) It is the case of the Union of India that there has been full compliance with regard to the allotment of foodgrains in relation to Antyodaya Anna Yojana. However, if any of the States gives a specific instance of non - compliance, the Union of India will do the needful within the framework of the Sc































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top