SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 291

S.H.KAPADIA, B.S.REDDY
MIL INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NOIDA – Respondent


Judgment

S.H. KAPADIA, J. - The short question which arises for determination in this civil appeal is whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "CESTAT") was right in entertaining the assessees appeal on dutiability against the order passed by Commissioner (A) dated 9 - 4 - 2003 in the quantum dispute, particularly when in the earlier round of litigation the Commissioner (A) had concluded vide order dated 22 - 3 - 2000 that the bought - out items were dutiable and which order had become final.

2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of plant and equipments for soaps, detergents and allied industries falling under Chapter Sub - Heading 8479.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The manufactured equipments were cleared by the appellants on payment of duty. The dispute relates to dutiability of certain bought - out items like motor pumps, heat exchangers, etc. The appellants had entered into a composite contract with M/s Godrej Soaps Ltd. and M/s Galaxy Surfactants Ltd. for the supply of various items which formed part of the fatty acid plant. Under the contract, in addition to the supply of the equipments manufactured by the appellants, v





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top