SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 365

S.H.KAPADIA, B.S.REDDY
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS – Appellant
Versus
HOME ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.H. KAPADIA, J. - In this civil appeal filed by the Department the short question which arises for determination is whether the assessee was entitled to avail MODVAT credit on differential duty paid during the period 21 - 4 - 1986 to 2 - 4 - 1987 in respect of inputs received in his factory during the year 198687 which inputs were utilised between the period 16 - 8 - 1987 and 30 - 12 - 1987. According to the Department, Rule 57 - E of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 underwent an amendment with effect from 15 - 4 - 1987 which according to the Department operated prospectively and consequently the claimant was not entitled to avail MODVAT credit of differential duty paid during the period 21 - 4 - 1986 to 2 - 4 - 1987.

2. The respondent assessee is a manufacturer of motor vehicles. The assessee had received inputs under the cover of specified documents between the period 21 - 4 - 1986 to 2 - 4 - 1987. After receipt of those inputs the price of those inputs stood revised by the supplier - cum - manufacturer of the inputs and consequently additional duty became payable on the enhanced price which the assessee paid during the period 19 - 12 - 1986 and 28 - 10 - 1987. The credit



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top