Judgment

DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, J. - The above writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India styled as public interest litigation has been preferred a for seeking enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. According to the petitioner, he is an advocate by profession and not connected or related to any political party or parties. According to him, he has filed this petition with an intention to highlight the root of corruption in U.P. Administration. According to him, he has no relation or connection with Congress Party as on date and that the documents which have been enclosed along with the additional affidavit filed by Respondent 3 would go to prove that Respondent 3 is having more access in the office of Congress Party, more than even the members of AICC/U.P. CC and that Respondent 3 with the help of some employees of AICC/U.P. CC succeeded in forging documents to project the petitioner as a sponsored person of Congress. It is also further stated that he is not connected with any c alleged PIL cell of the party concerned. The name of the petitioner does not appear in the list which is approved by the office of t