SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 880

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
DESTRUCTION OF PUBLIC & PRIVATE PROPERTIES, IN RE – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


ORDER

1. It has come to our notice that in the last one week there has been largescale destruction of public and private properties and no preventive action appears to have been taken and unfortunately it does not prima facie appear that any action has been taken against the offenders who were responsible for destruction of such properties. As the electronic media shows, the offenders feel that they have done some very heroic or laudable thing because they show their beaming faces when the TV camera is focused on them.

2. At our request, Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate, present in Court, has agreed to assist this Court as an amicus curiae. Dr. Dhavan may ask the TV channels concerned to provide the footage of the telecasts to the police authorities as also to him so that appropriate orders can be passed in the matter. Dr. Dhavan submitted that even if there may be a right to protest in some cases, that does not give licence to anybody to destroy properties and/or indulge in acts of vandalism.

3. We direct the Director Generals of Police of the States of Haryana, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh and the Commissioner of Police, Delhi to file affidavits in this Court as to what actions


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top