SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 362

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, D.K.JAIN
RAM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 19 - 8 - 2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. 146 - SB of 1992 whereby the High Court has maintained the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant herein by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind vide judgment and order dated 6 - 3 - 1992. We have heard Mr. D.K. Garg, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, learned counsel for the State and perused the judgment impugned in this appeal and the evidence tendered in this case. According to the prosecution, on 9 - 3 - 1991, the prosecutrix Bimla was abducted by the appellant Ram Kumar and she was subjected to sexual intercourse by him. On 17 - 3 - 1991, an FIR under Sections 366 and 376 of the Penal Code was registered at the instance of the father of the girl, namely, Shri Sher Singh. On 29 - 3 - 1991, the girl was recovered and as per the statement made by Smt Roshini (PW 7), the mother, she was brought by the police from Village Sirsawa on 29 - 3 - 1991 and on that date the police got the statement of the girl recorded in the Court of SDJM, Safidon under Section 164 of the Criminal P


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top