SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 435

S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
BHANWAR SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

1. The respondents herein were charged with commission of an offence under Section 342 and under Section 376 IPC. They were sentenced to a undergo three months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 for the offence under Section 342 and two years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500 for the offence under Section 376 IPC.

2. The prosecution case briefly put was: On 13 - 8 - 1979, in the evening, Bhanwar Singh, Respondent 1 herein (since deceased) had sent a boy named Gopia to the prosecutrix herein. She was asked to visit Respondent 1 on the b pretence that he was having fever and injection was required to be given. Respondent 1 was himself a physician. From the prosecution case, it appears that both the respondents committed the alleged offence. Having regard to the order proposed to be passed by us, we need not deal with the matter in detail. Suffice it to say that the trial court opined:

1. That Trishiamma had narrated the incident to Ramsingh while C going on foot from Anapur to Dantrail.

2. That Trishiamma had gone to Dr. R.C. Gupta, PW 4 in Revdar along with Sosamma. She had narrated the incident to him also and submitted report Exhibit P - 4.

3. That Tr














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top