SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 904

B.N.AGARWAL, P.P.NAOLEKAR, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
SHKUNTALA VASANT PAHADI – Appellant
Versus
PURUSHOITAM VASANT PETHE – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

2. The appellants filed a suit for eviction in the year 1977 impleading therein wife of one Vasant Pethe, who was the original tenant and died in the year 1969. The said suit was decreed against the wife of Vasant Pethe and decree passed by the trial court has been confirmed and the same attained finality, the matter having not been taken to any higher court. For execution of the said decree, an execution petition was filed. In the meantime, children of Vasant Pethe filed another suit in the year 1987 challenging the validity or otherwise of decree passed in the eviction suit referred to above filed in the year 1977 on the ground that at the time of death of their father who was the original tenant, they were minors and they along with their mother were residing in the rented premises, as such were necessary parties in the said eviction suit and they having not been made parties, the decree passed in such a suit was not binding upon them.

3. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court and the decree of the trial court was confirmed on appeal being filed by the plaintiff - respondents. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a writ peti


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top