Judgment

S.B. SINHA, J. - Leave granted.

2. The appellant, Respondent 1 and Respondent 2 are brothers. A suit for partition was filed by Respondent 1. A preliminary decree was passed on h 16 - 3 - 1999. An application purported to be a special darkhast was filed by him on 29 - 11 - 1999. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed. He was of the opinion that the property was impartible. A proposal was mooted that the property be put on sale in between the co - sharers. The appellant accepted the Commissioners report. He however filed an application for putting the said suit property on auction - sale and for equal distribution of the proceeds thereof amongst the co - sharers. An objection to the report of the said Advocate Commissioner was filed by the appellant. The court allowed the appellant to appoint an architect at his own cost. He, however, failed to comply with the said order. A sale proclamation was issued. The appellant expressed his intention to buy the said property at the valuation made by the government valuer. A valuation report was filed by the appellant on 4 - 5 - 2005 against which Respondent 1 filed an objection. The appellant was called upon to deposit 2/3rd of the a