Judgment

S.B. SINHA, J. - This appeal raises an interesting question of law in regard to interpretation of Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ("the Act", for short).

2. Harcharan Singh, original Defendant 1, allegedly transferred some properties in favour of his wife Udham Kaur in lieu of maintenance pursuant to a compromise entered into by and between them. She claimed herself to be the absolute owner thereof in terms of Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. She filed a suit against her husband Harcharan Singh for a declaration that she was the owner in possession of the suit land. The learned trial Judge was of the opinion that as she had been in possession of the property in lieu of maintenance, she was "entitled to enjoy the fruits thereof only during her lifetime". An appeal was preferred there against and the appellate court declared her to be the full owner in possession of the suit land. Indisputably, during pendency of the said suit, Harcharan Singh sold the said land to the respondent herein by a deed of sale dated 17 - 3 - 1982 and he had been given possession thereof. Another suit was filed by Udham Kaur.

3. The appellant (sic respondent), in the