SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 30

S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
BOMBAY DYEING & MFG. CO. LTD. (2) – Appellant
Versus
BOMBAY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION GROUP – Respondent


ORDER

1. Mr Arun Jaitley, learned Senior Counsel made his arguments from 2.00 p.m. to 2.25 p.m. Thereafter, Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, learned Senior Counsel made submissions up to 2.40 p.m. Thereafter, Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel made his submissions up to 2.50 p.m. Mr ES. Nariman, e learned Senior Counsel made submissions from 2.50 p.m. to 3.10 p.m. Mr T.R. Andhyarujina, learned Senior Counsel made his submissions for ten minutes.

2. Arguments concluded. Judgment reserved. Written submissions, if any, to be filed by Monday, 16 - 1 - 2006.

3. After hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the f petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner - respondents, the interim order dated 14 - 12 - 20051, passed by us, is modified to the extent that the petitioners concerned Le. those who are auction - purchasers of the lands belonging to National Textile Corporation and are otherwise covered by clause (e) of para 329 of the judgment of the High Court, shall be entitled to create third - party rights and/or raise 9 constructions subject to the condition that before creating such rights the third parties should be informed that the same shall be subj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top