SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 781

S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Madishetti Bala Ramul (D) By LRs – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

S.B. SINHA, J :

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order 09.02.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court whereby and whereunder the appeal preferred by the respondent herein under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act) against a judgment and award dated 02.01.1999 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal in O.P. No. 72 of 1997 was allowed in part.

3. Certain basic fact of the matter is not in dispute.

42 acres 08 guntas of land situated in Hanamkonda Village was acquired for a public purpose, namely, excavation of Kakatiya canal. A draft notification was published in the District Gazette under Section 4 of the Act for acquisition of 4 acres 10 guntas of the land in Survey No.622 on 16.03.1979. Possession of the said land was taken over on 18.05.1979. An award was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on 12.06.1988 fixing the market value of the acquired land @ Rs.75,000/- per acre. The said award, however, was confined to 1 acre 5 guntas only as the balance 3 acres 5 guntas of land was held to be belonging to the Government of Andhra Pradesh. A writ petition filed thereagainst, whi



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top