SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Milkmen Colony Vikas Samiti - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Others – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 246 of 2007
Arising out of SLP (C) NO.16751 of 2004)
With
Shri Ghanchi Mahasabha, Jodhpur - Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Chapter of Indian Association of Lawyers & Others - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 247 of 2007
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.23389-90 of 2004)
Decided on 17.01.2007
Advocates appeared
Mr. Kailash Vasudev, Mr. A.M. Singhvi, Mr. Rajeev Dhawan, Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Advocates, Mr. Aruneshwar Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Surya Kant, Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Mr. H.D. Thanvi, Mr. Sarad Singhania, Mr. Puneet Jain (for Ms. Pratibha Jain), Dr. Manish Singhvi (for Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran), Mr. A. Mariarputham, Mrs. Aruna Mathur, Ms. Mini N. Nari (for M/s. Arputham Aruna & Co.), Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh, Mr. Mukul Sood, Mr. N.M. Sharma, Mr. R.P. Singh, ty1r. Manu Mridul and Mr. Anant Kumar Vatsya (for Mr. T.V. Ratnam), Advocates with them for the appearing parties.
Public Interest Litigation - Milk Dairies - [Article 226, Constitution of India] - [Article 21, Constitution of India] - [Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960] - The court directed the relocation of milk dairies from the city of Jodhpur to address the nuisance caused by stray cattle and unhygienic conditions. The court emphasized the right to a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. The judgment highlighted the duty of the State to maintain ecological balance and the need to balance individual rights with the larger public interest.
Fact of the Case:
The High Court directed the relocation of milk dairies from the city of Jodhpur due to the nuisance caused by stray cattle and unhygienic conditions. The milkmen were provided opportunities to comply with the order, but failed to do so, leading to the appeals before the Supreme Court.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court's order to relocate the milk dairies was justified in the interest of the city's residents and to protect their constitutional rights under Article 21. The State Government had taken steps to comply with the High Court's directions, and the appellants' plea to relocate the dairies to a different site was rejected.
Issues: The issues included the justification of the High Court's directions to relocate the milk dairies, the failure of the milkmen to comply with the order, and the plea to relocate the dairies to a different site.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the right to a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. It highlighted the duty of the State to maintain ecological balance and the need to balance individual rights with the larger public interest.
Final Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order and issued further directions for the relocation of milk dairies, emphasizing the need for compliance and the State's duty to provide necessary infrastructure and facilities.
Judgment
DALVEER BHANDARI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. In a public interest litigation instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur, by the impugned judgment, has directed that the milk dairies located in the city of Jodhpur be shifted from their present location to alternative sites. These appeals by grant of special leave are preferred against the said judgment and order dated 12th July, 2004 of the High Court passed in D.B. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.4409 of 1994.
3. Both these appeals are inter-connected and are arising out of a common judgment, therefore, we would refer to the facts as mentioned in Civil Appeal No. 246 of 2007 arising out of SLP (C) NO.16751 of 2004.
4. The appellant-Milkmen Colony Vikas Samiti is an association of milkmen engaged in the business of selling milk and milk products in the city of Jodhpur (Rajasthan) for the last 44 years. The Government of Rajasthan vide Notification No. F.1 LSG/56 dated 5.11.1956 introduced a scheme, namely, Masuriya Colony Scheme, under which the members of the appellant Samiti and other milkmen, who were carrying on business of selling milk and milk products, were allotted plots of land in the city of Jodhpur @ RS.2/- per sq. yards. In all, 332 plots were allotted by the Government under the said scheme to different milkmen for developing dairies. Since 1956, the said milkmen have been carrying their business of selling milk and milk products in the above colony. The said colony was duly conceived and planned as a milkmen colony by the Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur with the approval of the State Government.
5. It is stated that the owners of the bovine animals, in the city of Jodhpur, after milching the bovine animals were turning them out of dairies so that they could eat whatever was available on the roads. The stray cattle including the cows, bulls, dogs etc. freely roam in the city of Jodhpur and in the porch of the Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, the principal government hospital in the city. It is further stated that the excreta of these animals was also visible all over, even in the corridors of the High Court. This totally unhygienic, unhealthy and injurious practice was creating considerable nuisance to the citizens of the city of Jodhpur.
6. The citizens of the City, being aggrieved by the said nuisance caused by the stray cattle and dogs, filed a petition in public interest in the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur through the Rajasthan Chapter of Indian Association of Lawyers, respondent no.4 herein, associated with the International Association of Democratic Lawyers established in 1946 and in consultative status with UN Economic and Social Council, UNESCO and UNICEF.
7. In the instant petition, it was stated that stray animals, such as, bulls, dogs and cattle were roaming all around inside and outside the city freely. Cattle were found loitering and squatting on the roads of Jodhpur City and that they were causing danger to human life and were creating a traffic hazard. It is stated in the petition that the entire city was full of dirt, refuge and was stinking beyond all limits and that the excreta of stray cattle was a breeding ground for various diseases. Drains were clogged and sewerage water was getting mixed up with the drinking water spreading many diseases. These unhygienic and unhealthy prevalent conditions are adversely affecting the quality of life of the residents living in the city of Jodhpur and thereby impinging upon their constitutional rights enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In the writ petition, following reliefs were prayed:
1. To direct the respondent Jodhpur Municipal Corporation and the Urban Improvement Trust to take steps to ensure that animals and cattle do not inhibit roads and public places and make proper arrangement in this behalf;
2. In order to oversee that all this is done, to appoint a Committee constituting of eminent citizens authorizing such Committee to see:
(i) that the d
Ramji Patel & Others v. Nagrik Upbhokta Marg Oarshak Manch & Others [JT 2000 (2) SC 205] (Para 28)
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Others [JT 2004 (Suppl.2) SC 109] (Para 22)
Virender Gaur & Others v. State of Haryana & Others [(1995) 2 SCC 577] (Para 20)
State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Mati Kureshi Kassab Jamat & Others [JT 2005 (12) SC 580] (Para 23)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.