SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 253

S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Manish Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. SINHA, J :

1. Leave granted.

2. Interpretation of the provision Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is in question in these appeals which arise out of judgments and orders dated 28.09.2004 and 14.03.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in I.T.A. Nos. 60 and 105 of 1999.

3. Before embarking on legal issues, we may notice the fact of matter from Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) NO.9751 of 2005.

4. The assessee M/s Indore Construction Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (for short, the Company) is a company registered and incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, the Act). One Shri Rameshwar Maheshwari is of one of its Directors. Shri Maheshwari, apart from being a Director of the said Company, is also a tax consultant.

A search was conducted, as contemplated under Section 132 of the Act, in the premises of the said Maheshwari and his wife Smt. Lalita Oevi on 21.11.1995. Several incriminating documents relating to the business of the Company were seized. A proceeding was initiated against the Company purported to be under Section 158BC of the Act. The order of assessment was passe

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top