SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 428

H.K.SEMA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
M. Srinivasa Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Controller & Auditor General of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.K. SEMA, J.

1. These two appeals raise a common question of facts and law and they are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of brevity, we are taking facts from Civil Appeal No.5504 of 2003.

2. The undisputed facts are that the appellants are direct recruits to the post of Section Officer" (Commercial Audit) in the Audit and Accounts department. Their services are governed by the recruitment Rules known as Indian Audit and Accounts Department Section Officer (Commercial Audit) Recruitment Rules, 1988 framed by the President of India under Article 148(5) of the Constitution of India.

3. The Rule inter alia provides the method of recruitment is by promotion failing which by transfer/transfer on deputation and failing both, by direct recruitment. The Rule also provides that the period of probation is two years. Note to Rule 11 provides that during the period of probation they should qualify in the Section Officers Grade Examination (SOGE) for appointment as regular Section Officers.

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the respondents that having accepted the terms and conditions of appointment they are stopped from challenging the same.

5. The appellants





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top