SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1019

H.K.SEMA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Nirmal Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.K. SEMA, J. —

1.Leave granted.

2.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 3rd April, 2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 10039 of 2005.

3.Briefly stated, the facts are as under:

“The respondent was working as Sub Divisional Engineer in Public Works Department (B&R). By an order dated 20.10.1999, the following charges were levelled against him:

“(1).Breach of trust in making attempt to pilferage Govt. Material/Cement.

(2).Negligence/ failure in the faithful discharge of his duties as Sub Divisional Engineer.

(3).Concealment of facts by making wrong statement.

(4).According approval to the indent for 200 bags of cement without assessing exact requirement.

(5).Failure in getting a case registered against the guilty persons and further failure in supervision of Government material and

(6).Failure to report to the authorities in time after being in the knowledge of the incident.”

4.The Competent Authority appointed Sh. B.D. Gupta, the then Superintending Engineer as Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry Officer submitted the report exonerating the respondent of the charges levelled against him. The Competent Authority disagreed with th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top