SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1356

2007(7) Supreme 265
Supreme Court of india
S.B. Sinha & Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. — Petitioner
versus
Cholleti Bharatamma & Ors. — Respondents
Appeal (civil) 4845-4847 of 2007
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7237-7239 of 2003)
[With CA Nos. 4848-4850, 4852-4854 of 2007 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7241-7243, 7248 and 7288-7290 of 2003]
Decided on : 12-10-2007

important points
The Motor Vehicles Act having been amended in 1994 the amendments would not be applicable to accidents prior to that date.
Well settled that ‘owner of the goods’ means only the person who travels in the cabin of the vehicle.

Headnote:(a)Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 147 – The Act does not contemplate that a goods carriage shall carry a large number of passengers with small percentage of goods as considerably the insurance policy covers the death or injuries either of the owner of the goods or his authorized representative. (Para 8)

       (2000) 1 SCC 237 – Referred.

       (2001) 6 SCC 713; (2003) 2 SCC 223; (2004) 2 SCC 1; (2005) 12 SCC 243; (2007) 3 SCALE 397 – Relied upon.

       (b)Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 147 – Occurrence having taken place on 16.12.1993, the 1994 amendment would not apply – Impugned judgment set aside.(Paras 12 and 14)

       (c)Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 147 – Well settled that ‘owner of the goods’ means only the person who travels in the cabin of the vehicle – The deceased admittedly boarded the lorry and paid an amount of Rs.20/- as transport charges – In absence of any material to prove that the deceased travelled as owner of the goods, respondents are not entitled to any protection under the Act.(Paras 17 and 18)

       (d)Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 147 – Deceased travelling as owner and premium having been paid for only one person, the claim in his respect is admissible.(Para 23)

       (e)Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 147 – The accident having taken place on 1.5.1997, hence the Act as amended in 1994 would apply – Victims of the accident were traveling along with the owner as his men – Impugned judgment not sustainable, set aside.(Paras 28 and 31)

       Facts of the case:

       The question involved in these appeals centres around the liability of the insurance company to indemnify the owner of the vehicle in respect of death of passengers travelling in goods carriage.

       The claimants were traveling in a lorry. It was a goods carriage carrying goods like rice, tent house articles, chairs, utensils and vegetables required on the occasions of marriage. The marriage of one D. Bhaskar was to take place. When the lorry reached Ali Nagar cross road at about 8.30 a.m., as a result of rash and negligent driving of the driver, the accident took place as the lorry struck to a stationary truck. Several people suffered injuries. Two of them died. Several claim applications were filed on behalf of the injured as also the dependents of the deceased.

       Findings of the Court:

       The Act having been amended in 1994 the amendments would not be applicable to accidents prior to that date.

       Law having been re-interpreted after Satpal’s case, any decision based on that will not be valid.

       Result : Civil Appeals arising out of SLP 7288-7290 of 2003 allowed. Rest of the appeals dismissed.

judgment

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1.Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

2.The question involved in these appeals centres around the liability of the insurance company to indemnif y the owner of the vehicle in respect of death of passengers travelling in goods carriage. The dates of accident being different, different provisions would apply. We would notice the law operating in the field at the outset and apply the same in each case separately.

3.The relevant portion of Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short the Act), prior to its amendment, reads as under :

Requirements of policies and limits of liability.-

(1)In order to comply with the requirements of this Chapter, a policy of insurance may be a policy which-

(a)***

(b)insures the person or classes of persons specified in the policy to the extent specified in Sub-section (2)-

(i)against any liability which may be incurred by him in respect of the death of or bodily injury to any person or damage to any property of a third party caused by a or arising out of the use of the vehicle in a public place;

(ii) ***

Provided that a policy shall not be required-

(i)to cover liability in respect of the death, arising out of and in the course of his employment, of the employees insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, any such employee-

(a)***

(b)***

(c)if it is a goods vehicle, being carried in the vehicle; or

(ii)except where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of or in pursuance of contract of employment, to cover liability in respect of the death of or bodily injury to persons being carried in or upon or entering or mounting or alighting from the vehicle at the time of the occurrence of the event out of which a claim arises–

4.The said provision underwent an amendment in the year 1994 by Motor Vehicles Amendment Act, 1994 which reads as under :

147 - Requirements of policies and limits of liability

(1)In order to comply with the requirements of this Chapter, a policy of insurance must be a policy which-

(a)***

(b)insurer the person or classes of persons specified in the policy to the extent specified in sub- section (2)-

(i)against any liability which may be incurred by him in respect of the death of or bodily injury to any person, including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle or damage to any property of a third party caused by or arising out of the use of the vehicle in a public place;

(ii)***

5.In New India Insurance Co. v. Satpal Singh & Ors.,1 [(2000) 1 SCC 237], this Court proceeded on an assumption that the provisions of 1939 Act and the provisions of 1988 Act are in pari materia.

6. In Satpal Singh (supra), interpreting the provisions contained in Sections 147 and 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, this Court held :

“Hence, under sub-section (2), there is no upper limitation for the insurer regarding the amount of compensation awarded in respect of death or bodily injury of a victim of the accident. It is, therefore, apparent that the limit contained in the old Act has been removed and the policy should insure the liability incurred and cover injury to any person including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle. The legislature has also taken care of even the policies which were in force on the date of commencement of the Act by specifically providing that any policy of insurance containing any limit regarding the insurers liability shall continue to be effective for a period of four months from commencement of the Act or till the date of expiry of such policy, whichever is earlier. This means, after the said period of four months, a new insurance policy consistent with the new Act is required to be obtained.

11. The result is that under the new A






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top