SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1285

2007(7) Supreme 315
Supreme Court of india
(From Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Tarun Chatterjee & R.V. Raveendran, JJ.
Haryana State Agricultural Mkt. Board and Anr. — Petitioners
versus
Naresh Kumar and Ors. — Respondents
Appeal (civil) 4670 of 2007
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.4971 of 2005)
Decided on : 05-10-2007

Case referred:
1.Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Haryana v. Ram Darup Ganda, C.A.No. 3250 of 2006, decided on 2nd of August, 2006 – Relied upon. [Para 3]

Headnote:Judicial Review – Since the question involved in this appeal already stands decided by an earlier judgment, instant appeal disposed on the same terms.(Para 3)

       Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Haryana v. Ram Sarup Ganda, C.A.No.3250 of 2006, decided on 2nd of August, 2006 – Relied upon.

       Facts of the case:

       This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th of August, 2003 passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P.No.569 of 2000. By the said order, the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court relying on its judgment passed in C.W.P No.805 of 2002- 805 of 2000 decided on 8th of March, 2002 disposed of the aforesaid writ petition on the same terms.

       Findings of the Court:

       The question involved in this appeal already stands decided by an earlier judgment.

       Result : Appeal decided in terms of the earlier judgment.

order

TARUN CHATTERJEE, J. —

1.Delay of 440 days in filing this special leave petition is condoned.

2.Leave granted.

3.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th of August, 2003 passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P.No. 569 of 2000. By the said order, the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court relying on its judgment passed in C.W.P No. 805 of 2002- 805 of 2000 decided on 8th of March, 2002 disposed of the aforesaid writ petition on the same terms. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties have supplied a copy of a judgment of this Court in a similar matter passed on 2nd of August, 2006 in C.A.No. 3250 of 2006 titled - Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana & Ors. vs. Ram Sarup Ganda & Ors. and submitted that this appeal may also be disposed of in terms of the said judgment. Since the question involved in this appeal has already been decided by this Court by the aforesaid judgment, we dispose of this appeal on the same terms as decided by this Court on 2nd of August, 2006 in C.A.No. 3250 of 2006 (Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Haryana & Ors. vs. Ram Sarup Ganda & Ors.,1)

4.The appeal is thus disposed of. No order as to costs.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top