2007(7) Supreme 409
Supreme Court of india
Arijit Pasayat & P.P. Naolekar, JJ.
State of Maharashtra — Appellant
Versus
Raju Bhaskar Potphode — Respondent
Crl. A. No. 339 of 2002
Decided on 18-07-2006
1.Accused respondents herein in the instant case were prosecuted for causing death of deceased by stabbing him with a knife. Trial Court convicted Respondents on basis of evidence of PW2, close relative of deceased. High Court however on appeal acquitted accused respondents doubting varsity of PW2’s evidence.
2.Present Appeal has been filed against said order of High Court
Findings of the Court :
The Court held that High Court found it unnatural that PW2 not bothered to provide medical assistance and also not informed police.
PW2 claimed to have left for his home. Whether PW2 came back or not was another doubtful question as he himself admitted in cross examination that he stayed at home. Quite unnatural conduct on part of close relative to leave a relative in a pool of blood not bothering to take him to hospital and not to return after having left spot. Again, his conduct in not informing police was another relevant factor. Presence of PW2 at time of occurrence was highly doubtful High Court rightly discarded testimony of PW2 observing that his conduct not appeared to be natural and trustworthy. So called discovery of alleged weapon pursuant to disclosure by accused held not relevant as knife was found in an open space and was clearly visible. Cumulative effect of infirmities as noticed by high Court went to root of matter. No infirmity was found in judgment of acquittal recorded by High Court so as to warrant interference. Appeal having no merit was dismissed.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
Judgment
1.Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court directing acquittal of respondent-Raju Bhaskar Potphode (hereinafter referred to as the ‘accused’). Accused was found guilty of the offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for lift by learned additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.355 of 1993. Accusations which led to the trial of the accused was that he had on 7.2.1993 at about 4.30 p.m. committed the murder of one Sunil Gore (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) by stabbing with a knife.
2.Prosecution case in a nutshell is as follow:
On 7th February, 1993, the Sai Krupa Cricket Club had organized Single Wicket Cricket Competition on an open playground near Sai Mandir, Samarth Nagar, Majaswadi, Jogeshwari (E). In the said competition boys of Majaswadi locality 44 boys including the first informant-Ravindranath Damle, (PW 1), Uday Gore PW 2), Arun Raghunath Paranjape (PW 3), Santosh Lad (PW 4), Girish Modak, had participated. At about 9.00 a.m. after drawing of the lots, as regards which player was to play with whom, the competition started. Vijay Potphode the brother of the respondent, and one Mr. Troy had allegedly taken part in the said competition. At about 4 p.m., out of 44 competitors, 6 participants emerged out as winners and as a further step Vijay and Troy were to play with each other. As both belong to one and the same club, they refused to play against each other and requested for a change of draw. Deceased-Sunil Gore who was responsible for the draw, however, was not ready and willing to change the draw. Deceased-Sunil Gore asked Vijay to withdraw from the competition and to take back subscription if he did not want to play against Troy. This led to exchange of hot words. The said altercation was allegedly being witnessed by the respondent who intervened and started taking the side of his brother Vijay. The members of the Sai Krupa Cricket Club intervened in the said altercation and pacified the situation and asked the respondent to leave the playground. It is further alleged that the respondent left and returned back with a knife and stabbed Sunil Gore on his abdomen. Due to this, Sunil Gore received stab injuries and collapsed on the ground. The respondent allegedly threatened all not to come near him and ran away with the knife. Sunil Gore was removed to Cooper Hospital) however, he was declared dead before admission. At about 5.25 p.m. on 7th February 1993 the first informant Ravindranath (PW 1) went to Jogeshwari Police Station and lodged the FIR which was reduced into writing vide Exhibit- 6 by Uday Bhanu Sharma (PW 12). An offence was registered against the accused at CR No.4 7 of 1993 at Jogeshwari Police Station on the basis of the FIR. Shri Sharma (PW 12) took up the investigation. He visited the hospital. He held the inquest on the dead body and a panchanama to that effect was drawn at Exhibit-11. The dead body was sent for post-mortem examination. He visited the spot and drew the panchanama of the scene of offence at Exhibit-10 in presence of two panchas. After recording the panchanama of the scene of offence, the investigating officer recorded statements of witnesses. On 8th February, 1993 accused Raju Bhaskar Potphode was arrested from his residence. He was brought to the police station. His clothes were attached under the seizure, panchanama at Exhibit-34 in presence of the two panchas, viz.George Anthony D’Souze (PW 8) and Pradeep Shankar Hazak (PW 9). There were blood stains on the clothes of the accused. Clothes were packed, labelled and sealed under the signatures of panchas. The accused was interrogated in presence of the panchas. On 11th February 1993 the accused made a statement that he would show the knife. His statement was recorded at Exhibit-16. In pursuance of the said statement, the accused led the investigating offic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.