SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1309

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
K. Prakashan – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Surenderan – Respondent


judgment

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2.The impugned judgment is one of reversal of a judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Trial Judge in favour of the appellant.

3. Respondent herein allegedly, on diverse dates, advanced a sum of Rs. 3,16,000/- to the appellant who issued a cheque for the said amount on 18.12.1995. The said cheque was dishonoured on the ground of insufficient fund. Allegedly, when the matter was brought to the notice of the appellant, he undertook to remit the amount on or before 30.01.1996. The cheque was again presented but the same was not encashed on the ground “payment stopped by the drawer”.

4. On the aforementioned premise, a complaint petition was filed by the respondent herein against the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short “the Act”).

5. The complainant in support of its case led evidence to show that he had advanced various sums on the following terms :

“On 31-1-94 a sum of Rs. One lakh; on 8-6-94, Rs. 86,000/-; on 12-6-94, Rs. 28,000/-; on 23-4-95, Rs. 50,000/- on 18-6-95, Rs. 40,000/- and on 7-8-95, Rs. 12,000/-.”

6. Defence of the appellant, on the other hand, was that he had issued blank cheques for the pur







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top