SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1612

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
State Government of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Shankarlal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.—

1.Respondent was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk in the Public Works Department on 25.9.1971. He was promoted as Upper Division Clerk on 1.1.1979.

2.A departmental proceeding was initiated against him. He was placed under suspension by an order dated 4.9.1982. In the said order of suspension, it was clearly stipulated that subsistence allowance would be paid to him in terms of Rule 53 of the Fundamental Rules. On or about 19.6.1982, he was transferred from Katni to Barhi. He did not join at Barhi after the order of suspension was passed. It appears that a communication was issued to him on 5.10.1983 asking him to collect the subsistence allowance stating :

“(1)You are suspended by the Superintending Engineer PWD (B&R) Jabalpur Circle, Jabalpur vide order No.1164/E-11-19 of 74 dated 4.9.82 and suspension order was sent to you, but you have refused to take it.

(2)Charge sheet was issued by SEJC vide No.2067/E-11-19 of 74 dated 16.10.82, and sent through peon and 2 sub-Engineer of this Division, but you have refused to take it.

(3)Executive Engineer, PWD (E/M) Dn. Jabalpur Enquiry officer of your D.E. case have served the notice for facing the DE and attending



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top