SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1326

2007(8) Supreme 734
Supreme Court of india
(From Bangalore High Court)
S.B. Sinha & H.S. Bedi, JJ.
Commr. of Customs, Bangalore — Petitioner
versus
M/s ACER India Pvt. Ltd. — Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 2321 of 2007

Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mohan Parasaran, ASG., K. Swamy and B. Krishna Prasad, Advocates.
For the Respondent:M.P. Devanath and Monish Panda, Advocates.

Important Point
A Computers (Additional Duty) Rules, 2004 is a taxing statute. It is required to be construed strictly.

Headnote:Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – Sections 3(3), 3(4) and Entry 8471 of chapter 84 of Schedule I – Computers (Additional Duty) Rules, 2004 – Rule 2 – Levying of additional duty on laptops – Permissibility – Whether notebook computers (laptop computers are “CPU with monitor mouse and keyboard imported together as a set” and subject to additional duty of 7% ? – Held, no – A laptop or a notebook being an integrated item cannot be said to be a set of a CPU with monitor, mouse and keyboard – Hence not liable to additional duty – Customs Act, 1962 – Section 19. (Para 20)

       Facts of the Case :

       Respondent herein imported some laptop computers. Excise duty is payable thereupon. Relying on or on the basis of purported Entry under Tariff item No. 8471 read with Section 33 of the Customs Tariff Act, the Assessing Authority held that additional tax was imposable thereupon.

       An order of the Assessing Authority to the said extent was set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals), the appeal filed by the Revenue before the Tribunal was dismissed.

       Hence this appeal.

       Appellant submitted that Entry 8471 of the Tariff framed in terms of the Customs Tariff Act encompasses within its fold desktops and laptops. A laptop being a computer which has all the attributes of desktop is amenable to excise duty.

       Respondent, on the other hand, submitted that desktops and laptops are known differently in the market. Having regard to the object and purport of the levy of additional duty a CPU with its accessories in a set does not answer the description of a laptop or a notebook.

       Finding of the Court :

       A laptop or a notebook being an integrated item cannot be said to be a set of a CPU with monitor, mouse and key board.

       Result : Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1.Revenue is in appeal before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 13.09.2006 passed by the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench at Bangalore in Appeal No. C/135 of 2005 dismissing an appeal upon an order dated 28.12.2004 by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Bangalore.

2.The question which falls for our consideration herein is as to whether notebook computers (laptop computers) are “CPU with monitor, mouse and keyboard imported together as a set” classified under Sl. No. 2 of the Table in Rule 2 of the Computers (Additional Duty) Rules, 2004 and in terms whereof the said goods would be subjected to an additional duty of 7%.

3.Respondent herein imported some laptop computers. Excise duty is payable thereupon. Relying on or on the basis of the purported Entry under Tariff Item No. 8471 read with Section 33 of the Customs Tariff Act, the Assessing Authority held that additional tax was imposable thereupon.

4.An order of the Assessing Authority to the said extent has been set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal filed by the Revenue before the Tribunal, as noticed hereinbefore, has been dismissed.

5.Mr. Mohan Parasaran, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the appellant, in support of this appeal, inter alia would submit that the Tribunal committed an error insofar as it failed to take into consideration that the goods in question would not come within the purview of the said Rules. It was urged that Entry 8471 of the Tariff framed in terms of the Customs Tariff Act encompasses within its fold desktops and laptops. A laptop being a computer which has all the attributes of desktop is amenable to excise duty.

6.Mr. M.P. Devanath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the other hand, would submit that desktops and laptops are known differently in the market. In any event, having regard to the object and purport of the levy of additional duty, a CPU with its accessories in a set does not answer the description of a laptop or a notebook. Our attention in this behalf has been drawn to some literature.

7.The Customs Tariff Act was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to Customs Duties. Section 3 of the Act provides for levy of additional duty equal to excise duty; sub-sections (3) and (4) whereof read as under :

“(3)If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest to levy on any imported article [whether on such article duty is leviable under sub-section (1) or not] such additional duty as would counter-balance the excise duty leviable on any raw materials, components and ingredients of the same nature as, or similar to those, used in the production or manufacture of such article, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that such imported article shall, in addition, be liable to an additional duty representing such portion of the excise duty leviable on such raw materials, components and ingredients as, in either case, may be determined by rules made by the Central Government in this behalf.

(4)In making an rules for the purposes of sub-section (3), the Central Government shall have regard to the average quantum of the excise duty payable on the raw materials, components or ingredients used in the production or manufacture of such like article.”

8.The purpose of levying an additional duty is absolutely clear and unambigous. It is to protect the domestic manufacturers. It provides for a level playing field. Entry 8471 of Chapter 84 of the Schedule appended to the said Act inter alia provides for automatic data processing machines and units thereof. The relevant entries are as under :

“8471 30–Portable digital automatic data processing machines, weighing not more than 10kg, consisting of at least a central processing unit, a keyboard and a display :

8471 30 10 –Personal computer

8471 30 90 –Other

–Other digital automatic data proc




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top