S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
T. Vijendradas – Appellant
Versus
M. Subramanian – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
S.B. SINHA, J :
1.Leave granted.
2.A short but interesting question in regard to interpretation of Order XXI, Rule 92(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, CPC) is involved in this appeal.
Facts :
3.R. Venugopal (since deceased), original defendant No.3, was the owner of the suit property consisting of 8 cents and 116 sq. ft. of land situated within the Coimbatore Municipal Corporation (for short, the Municipality). He transferred his right, title and interest therein by reason of a registered deed of sale in favour of one Sakunthala, the original plaintiff no. 1 in the suit and mother of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein. It is, however, not in dispute that the factum of sale was not intimated to the authorities of the Municipality either by the vendor or by the vendee thereof. The vendee s name was not mutated in the records of the Municipality. Indisputably, property tax in respect of premises in question had not been paid for the period from 01.04.1970 to 31.03.1973. The property tax for two quarters, thus, was to be paid by Venugopal whereas the rest was to be paid by the vendee. The matter relating to payment of property tax is governed by the Tamil Nadu Dis
Referred to : S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by Lrs. v. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Others
Mangru Mahto and Others v. Shri Thakur Taraknathji Tarakeshwar Math and Others
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and Others v. Ajay Kumar Das and Others
Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan and Another
Ram Chandra Singh v. Savitri Devi
A. Umarani v. Registrar, Cooperative societies and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.