SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1182

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
C. A. Pious – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

1.Leave granted.

2.Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court dismissing the writ appeal filed by the appellant.

3.Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:

The appellant is suffering life imprisonment in Central Jail, Kannur in view of the conviction for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). He made a claim before the State Government that the Kerala Prison Rules, 1958 (in short Rules) provide for release on probation on completion of 8 years of custody. According to him the period of study leave amounting to 6 years 10 months and 13 days have to be reckoned while computing the period of sentence undergone. The prayer was rejected on the ground that the writ petitioner had not suffered 8 years of custodial sentence and, in fact, he had undergone imprisonment for 6 years, 3 months and 25 days to which the remand period of 1 month and 17 days is to be added making a total of 6 years 5 months and 10 days. The High Court found substance in the stand of the State Government with reference to Rule 225(2) that the writ petitioner was not entitled to any r





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top