SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1113

P.P.NAOLEKAR, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
LAL DEI – Appellant
Versus
HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT – Respondent


ORDER

1. We have heard counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The wife and children of the deceased Narain Singh filed the claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for his death in a bus accident. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal was pleased to allow the petition of the petitioners and awarded Rs 7,96,280 with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition to the claimants. While awarding the compensation, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has taken into consideration the family pension given to the family while calculating the amount of compensation. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has deducted the family pension amount from the dependency of the claimants. Both the parties have preferred an appeal and the cross-objection in the High Court. The award made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal with interest was upheld by the High Court and cross-objection was dismissed. Against the said order of the High Court, the present special leave petition was filed.

4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that while calculating the dependency, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal as well as the High Court committ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top