ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
Ram Avtar Patwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
1.Leave granted.
2.Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court allowing the Civil Writ Petitions filed by non official respondents.
3.Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:The Subordinate Services Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') issued an advertisement dated 7.11.1992 calling for applications for filling up 1248 posts of Patwar candidates to be deputed to the Patwar Training School and on completion of training, for appointment as Patwaris. Appellants had applied for the said posts. The list of the selected candidates was finalized and displayed from which it transpired that against the advertised posts 2395, candidates had been recommended by the Board for admission to the Patwar Training School. One of the writ petitioners filed an application to the Board asking for the supply of details of the performance of the selected candidates, but those were not given. The selection was impugned in the writ petitions on several grounds. It was pointed out that the selection beyond the advertised posts was bad in law, the marks for performance in the interview were to be restricted to 15% wh
Referred to : Satpal Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana
Kiran Gupta and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Jaswinder Singh v. State of J and K
Vijay Syal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Ajay Hasia etc. v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi and Ors.
Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Satpal and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.